Re: ACTION- 541: Jeni to help Dan pull together terminology on Deep Linking

>> I'm aware that this action is due today. We have a document that is  
>> partially completed and certainly done enough for a bit of  
>> discussion, available at:
>>
>>   https://docs.google.com/View?id=dgnh4s67_2cv7hf5c7

Great stuff, thanks!
Regarding the linking methods, you might want to take Amundsen's H  
Factor [1] into account?


Cheers,
	Michael

[1] http://amundsen.com/hypermedia/hfactor/

--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html

On 29 Mar 2011, at 22:53, Noah Mendelsohn wrote:

>
> On 3/29/2011 5:07 PM, Jeni Tennison wrote:
>> I'm aware that this action is due today. We have a document that is  
>> partially completed and certainly done enough for a bit of  
>> discussion, available at:
>>
>>   https://docs.google.com/View?id=dgnh4s67_2cv7hf5c7
>>
>> If there is time for it to be discussed on Thursday's call, all the  
>> better.
>
> Perfect timing. I'm just starting on the agenda now, and I'll put it  
> on. Based on a quick skim, it's an impressive start. Thank you!
>
> One comment: if working in Google Docs is helping you with a bit of  
> early collaboration I suppose that's OK for a little while, but it  
> seems to me that drafts for TAG publications really should live in  
> W3C space. That way, W3C can take responsibility for long-term  
> archiving, maintenance of stable URIs, etc. Might it be possible to  
> move this into W3C/TAG CVS space soon? I note the document also  
> lacks things like explicit copyright statements, which we also  
> normally would put explicitly into a draft that matches W3C  
> pubrules.  Getting all that right would be good (some of us use  
> variations on the xmlspec.xsl template, which has its own pros and  
> cons), but either way I think having it in W3C space at least goes  
> some way to making it a de-facto W3C publication.
>
> Noah
>
> P.S. Dan, your out-of-office note suggested you'd be back today, and  
> I'm assuming you'll on the call this Thurs. Is that right? We're up  
> to two agenda items that focus on your work, and if you won't be  
> there then, combined with others' regrets, that might tip the scales  
> toward canceling the call.
>

Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2011 08:00:39 UTC