- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:48:39 -0700
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, Tore Eriksson <tore.eriksson@po.rd.taisho.co.jp>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
> Wouldn't it be safer to use a license embedded in R (i.e. in HTML > META tags)? > (Advising against using RDF is funny to hear from someone who puts RDF > in their email signature.) > Not all metadata can be embedded, either. I'd like to pursue this a little. "Embedding" is the primary way of accomplishing "with as strong a location proximity as possible". Perhaps "most" formats can be extended to support embedding, with only a few exceptions (e.g., text/plain) where the metadata needs to be linked or stored closely. You could say the same for "buckets of bits" vs. "typed representations", e.g., I send you a stream of bytes but you need some additional data (the content-type) to actually interpret the bytes. It's best if the hints for content-type are embedded (with 'magic numbers' or other kinds of content-type sniffing hints), but in other cases you need additional data that is in some other kind of proximity. Is there a theory that explains both metadata linking and content-type sniffing?
Received on Friday, 24 June 2011 19:49:12 UTC