- From: Xiaoshu Wang <xiao@renci.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:24:17 +0000
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- CC: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
On 6/24/11 2:06 PM, "Jonathan Rees" <jar@creativecommons.org> wrote: >On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Xiaoshu Wang <xiao@renci.org> wrote: >> I have stated my solutions many times. Here it is again: >> >> Don't ask people to make inference from *how* a message is received. Ask >> people to make assertions in the message *explicitly*, with more refined >> terms suited to their intended granularity. > >You misunderstood me. I am *not* talking about whatever problem you >think the above is a solution to. The problem to which I seek >solutions is: > >given http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Fire >how do I say (in RDF or equivalent): >1. that the wiki page is licensed according to l1 >2. that Pale Fire is licensed according to l2 > >without modifying either the wiki page or Pale Fire. > >It's not that hard; I just want to know concretely what others think, >especially those who would jettison httpRange-14. If http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Fire is used as it is: wiki:Pale_Fire a ex:WebPage. wiki:Pale_Fire ex:licence ex:l1. wiki:Pale_Fire ex:topic <aURI> . <aURI> a ex:Book. <aURI> ex:licence ex:l2. If http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Fire is used to refer the book, then wiki:Pale_Fire a ex:Book. wiki:Pale_Fire ex:licence ex:l2. <aURI> ex:webPageOf wiki:Pale. <aURI> ex:licence ex:l1. Xiaoshu
Received on Friday, 24 June 2011 18:24:59 UTC