- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:49:25 -0400
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@gmail.com>
- CC: 'John Kemp' <john@jkemp.net>, www-tag@w3.org, iab@iab.org, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, 'Thomas Roessler' <tlr@w3.org>
I agree. In fact, FWIW, I would suggest prioritizing this ahead of things like versioning. Noah On 6/4/2011 4:48 PM, Larry Masinter wrote: > One proposed slight modification to the agenda of the TAG/IAB > call/meeting for next Tuesday is to be specific about one security > topic: > > A specific important area of collaboration between IETF and W3C is > around web security, with both a IETF WEBSEC working group > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/charters as well as W3C work on web > security in W3C groups for HTML and within the W3C security activity. > > > Within the TAG, some work started on some architectural writing around > web security: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/02/security-web.html > (SUGGESTED PREREADING). > > One of the actions is to figure out how to move this work forward > within the TAG, elsewhere in W3C, or jointly with IAB or with other > groups. > > How does IAB handle architectural guidelines for Security? Is this > something that should be developed jointly between IETF/W3C? As joint > work between TAG and IAB, or within the IETF WEBSEC working group? > > Re: ACTION-515 and ACTION-516 > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 4 June 2011 20:49:53 UTC