W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2011

Re: Feedback on Internet Media Types and the Web

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:21:24 +0100
Message-ID: <4D54F184.5020901@gmx.de>
To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
CC: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, "Eric J. Bowman" <eric@bisonsystems.net>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On 11.02.2011 07:33, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
> Hello Julian,
> On 2011/02/11 0:10, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 10.02.2011 15:57, Chris Lilley wrote:
>>> For +xml, that handling is
>>> - parsing
>>> - well formedness checking
>>> - validation
>>> - looking for namespaces you recognise
>>> - handing a dom to some other process
>>> For +zip:
>>> - display contents of zipfile (as a tree-like filebrowser)
>>> - look for particular things inside (manifest.xml)
>>> - offer to extract some, rather than all, of the contents
>> Is any of these three above something you *want* to happen when opening
>> an ePub file?
> Yes and no.
> Yes in that the Epub application definitely will look for particular
> things inside, extract some, and so on.

Understood. But the *EPub* application will do that no matter what 
format the media type has.

The question was about the case where you do *not* have an EPub reader 
installed. Would a user expect to see the contents of the archive, or a 
notification that the system doesn't have an application for that type. 
I believe the answer is "the latter" for most non-programmers.

> No in that it won't do this things only. But then again, is anything in
> the +xml list something you (only!) *want* to happen if you are opening
> an image/svg+xml file?
> The +foo suffixes are helpful not for when you have an application for
> the exact type, but for when you don't, and have to fall back to more
> generic processing.

Exactly; the question is what generic processing can be done.

For +xml we know about some use cases in UAs, such as XmlHttpRequest. 
For +json, it would be the same.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 11 February 2011 08:22:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:37 UTC