Re: Feedback on Internet Media Types and the Web

Larry Masinter wrote:
> 
> For "+json" to be useful for anything, it has to mean something that
> everyone agrees to it meaning... and the only way we have of getting
> that agreement is to publish a document and put it through a
> consensus process (notwithstanding those who prefer the" willful
> violation" path).
>

Sure.  But first, the groundwork for such an effort must be laid, such
that it applies to +anything.  I'm talking about defining extensions in
the registry, not +json per se.

What's the counter-argument here, in favor of leaving extensions
undefined?

-Eric