On 1/31/2011 11:34 AM, Jonathan Rees wrote: > In any case I thought the session was to be about ACTION-478, which > asks the latter question. So, trying to sort through this, I understand that you prefer that the session be scoped to "how should we write persistent references and how would we make any chosen solution stick", which is fine. What's unclear to me is whether you actually expect to have new work on 478 ahead of the F2F? Anyway, I'll change the session as you suggest. NoahReceived on Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:52:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:37 UTC