Re: Preliminary version of the Agenda for the TAG F2F Meeting of 8-10 February 2011

On 1/31/2011 6:23 PM, Jonathan Rees wrote:
> tdb: isn't really part of AWWSW business either. I don't think 45
> minutes is enough time to dive deep on tdb: AND hear about AWWSW
> status. So maybe leave it as is but make clear that it's a distinct
> item of business, so that we don't get confused. The way you had
> written it, it appears that it has something to do with ISSUE-50.
>
>> From my experience with all three of these topics these sessions are
> going to be a very tight squeeze. If 1:45 is all we can spare on both
> combined we might want to sacrifice one so we have more time on
> another.

Thank you, that's very helpful, both in terms of being good advice, and in 
terms of connecting better with my recollection of how tdb got on the 
agenda in the first place. I'm spending the afternoon juggling things, but 
will attempt to keep in mind that AWWSW and tdb aren't connected in the way 
I had inferred (not that I ever had a theory about the connection -- I just 
had a note suggesting I should keep them together.)

Noah

Received on Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:43:06 UTC