- From: mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 21:13:29 -0500
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: nathan@webr3.org, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 20:08, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > * Nathan wrote: >>http://amundsen.com/blog/archives/1090 > > This criticism is misplaced. What criticism would that be? mca http://amundsen.com/blog/ http://twitter.com@mamund http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me #RESTFest 2010 http://rest-fest.googlecode.com > The underlying technologies do not have a > notion of "private" versus "public" resource; web browsers sit on the > boundary between "private" and "public", but they cannot tell what ca- > tegory a given resource belongs to. Browser vendors realize that making > private things public is bad, just as having no untested and unreviewed > features someone made up on the spot in the next release is bad, so we > end up with all sorts of nonsense in the euphemistic "Web Platform". > -- > Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de > Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de > 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ > >
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2011 02:14:03 UTC