- From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 02:29:32 -0700
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- CC: "Appelquist, Daniel, VF-Group" <Daniel.Appelquist@vodafone.com>, Paul Libbrecht <paul@hoplahup.net>, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, tag <www-tag@w3.org>
Thank you for the clarification, Rigo. I agree. All the best, Ashok On 4/14/2011 9:30 AM, Rigo Wenning wrote: > Ashok, Dan, > > my point goes beyond. I think that by suppressing the link, we not only > interfere with the speech of a person, but with the functionality of the web. > So the damage goes beyond the freedom of speech for the person linking or > expressing an opinion by linking. Imagine e.g. a namespace with a > controversial namespace in it. > > Rigo > > On Thursday 14 April 2011 17:47:42 Appelquist, Daniel, VF-Group wrote: >> That was kind of my point (and sorry for making it obliquely). We can only >> make a technical argument (that linking on the Web is a form of speech). >> Even if this argument is accepted, this won't save people from being >> arrested for linking (or other kinds of speech) in countries where free >> speech is not respected. >>
Received on Friday, 15 April 2011 09:31:33 UTC