W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2011

Re: author-only view of HTML5 and ACTION-190

From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:44:01 -0400
Message-ID: <4DA49D71.7090909@arcanedomain.com>
To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org)" <mike@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Paul,

I was wondering whether you might give me an update on the status of this? 
I followed some of the links from your ACTION-190 [1]; as best I can tell 
it was put off for a week on 6 January 2011 [2], and then I lose the trail. 
This is about getting the author-only view back into the HTML5 Rec-track 
publication packages.

I have TAG ACTION 379, which is basically to make sure this happens 
eventually, so it would be helpful to know where this stands. Thank you 
very much.

Noah

[1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/190
[2] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-announce/2011JanMar/0001.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/379

On 11/4/2010 6:16 AM, Paul Cotton wrote:
> I am bringing forward how we handled ISSUE-59 since Noah M, (TAG Chair)
> asked me today to confirm that we did what we promised in the email below.
>
>>  There was general agreement that the author-only view of the main spec,
> plus a commitment to maintain it and improve its quality, was sufficient as
> a normative reference.
>
> Useful references for this discussion are:
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/59
>
> and Mike's action item that produced the first PWD of H:TML
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/168
>
>  From the current Editor’s draft:
>
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html
>
>>  This specification is available in the following formats: single page
> HTML <http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html>, multipage HTML
> <http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/spec.html>, web developer edition
> <http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/author/>.
>
> The "author-only view" aka "web developer edition” appears to be available
> for the current Editors draft but the link that occurs in the Editors Draft
> is NOT available in the current TR version at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-html5-20101019/. The link was previously
> published in the June WD: see http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-html5-20100624/
>
> Mike Smith has explained to me that the link was not included on the last
> publication cycle since the “author-only view” did not pass pubrules and he
> could not get the problems fixed in the time we gave him to publish the 8
> WD specifications.
>
> Mike and I have created ACTION-190 to track the work needed to solve this
> problem:
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/190
>
> /paulc
>
> PS: This is TAG Issue-379.
>
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
>
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
>
> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Maciej Stachowiak
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 12:55 AM
> To: HTMLWG WG
> Subject: CfC: Close ISSUE-59 normative-language-reference (ends 2009-12-17)
>
> At TPAC, we had a joint session with the TAG where we discussed their
> interest in having a separate language reference. There was general
> agreement that the author-only view of the main spec, plus a commitment to
> maintain it and improve its quality, was sufficient as a normative
> reference. There was also agreement that Mike's document would be useful
> and beneficial as a non-normative reference guide to the syntax. Therefore,
> it seems there is no more controversy over ISSUE-59, and we should close it
> by amicable resolution.
>
> If there are no objections, this issue will be closed on December 17, 2009.
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/59
>
> Regards,
>
> Maciej
>
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2011 18:44:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:38 UTC