W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2011

Re: FragIds in semantic web (ACTION-543)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 10:57:49 +0200
Message-ID: <4D9D7C8D.7000204@gmx.de>
To: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
CC: Jeni Tennison <jeni.tennison@googlemail.com>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
On 07.04.2011 10:23, Graham Klyne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if it helps, but for RDF we tried to finesse the differing
> interpretation of MIME types somewhat:
>
> "... a URI reference in an RDF graph is treated with respect to the MIME
> type application/rdf+xml [RDF-MIME-TYPE]" /et seq./
> -- http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-fragID
>
> Also, w.r.t. to GET having no content: I was wrestling with this a while
> ago and, like you, could find nothing in HTTP that actually prohibited a
> GET request having an entity body. But IIRC the HTTP spec also made it
> ...

-> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/19>

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 08:58:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:38 UTC