- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 10:57:49 +0200
- To: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
- CC: Jeni Tennison <jeni.tennison@googlemail.com>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
On 07.04.2011 10:23, Graham Klyne wrote: > Hi, > > I don't know if it helps, but for RDF we tried to finesse the differing > interpretation of MIME types somewhat: > > "... a URI reference in an RDF graph is treated with respect to the MIME > type application/rdf+xml [RDF-MIME-TYPE]" /et seq./ > -- http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-fragID > > Also, w.r.t. to GET having no content: I was wrestling with this a while > ago and, like you, could find nothing in HTTP that actually prohibited a > GET request having an entity body. But IIRC the HTTP spec also made it > ... -> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/19> Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 08:58:34 UTC