Re: FragIds in semantic web (ACTION-543)

On 07.04.2011 10:23, Graham Klyne wrote:
> Hi,
> I don't know if it helps, but for RDF we tried to finesse the differing
> interpretation of MIME types somewhat:
> "... a URI reference in an RDF graph is treated with respect to the MIME
> type application/rdf+xml [RDF-MIME-TYPE]" /et seq./
> --
> Also, w.r.t. to GET having no content: I was wrestling with this a while
> ago and, like you, could find nothing in HTTP that actually prohibited a
> GET request having an entity body. But IIRC the HTTP spec also made it
> ...

-> <>

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 08:58:34 UTC