- From: Noah Mendelsohn <noah@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:15:40 -0500
- To: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
- CC: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
This note is in fulfillment of my ACTION-498: Report results of HTML5 WG consideration of conformance for extensions (their ISSUE 140), get TAG to prepare change proposal if necessary I have updated the TAG action record [1] as follows: ---- I met F2F with the HTML working group to discuss this concern on 4 Nov 2010 in Lyon. Minutes of that discussion are available at http://www.w3.org/2010/11/04-html-wg-minutes.html (note that the date on those minutes is incorrect [now fixed -- NRM]. The discussion was in fact on 4 Nov 2010). I believe my concerns were heard and reasonably well understood. Henri Sivonen in particular seemed to share my concern, and to also believe that changes should be made to the HTML5 draft specification. The matter is now in the hands of the HTML WG and chairs, and is being tracked as http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/140 . ---- TAG ACTION-498 is now marked pending review, and I believe that we do not need further telcon discussion at this time. I presume that I will be contacted by the HTML WG when they have a proposed disposition of their ISSUE 140, and I will report on that to the TAG. We'll briefly discuss this during our bulk review of pending actions. Regarding change proposals: repeating what I said in Lyon, there was from the start a change proposal from me in the bugzilla entry [2] that led to the HTML WG issue. That proposal was discussed with the HTML WG in Lyon, and as noted above, there was some sympathy for making the change. Accordingly, I see no need for the TAG to make additional change proposals at this time. Let's see what the HTML WG proposes to do. Noah [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/498 [2] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9178
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 15:16:09 UTC