Re: image/svg+xml, was: Feedback on Internet Media Types and the Web

On 08.11.2010 19:59, Noah Mendelsohn wrote:
> Julian Reschke wrote:
>
>  > Which reminds me that it may be time for the TAG to look into the
>  > image/sxg+xml issue.
>
> I assume that's a typo for svg+xml?

Yes.

> I'd first be curious to hear what some of those responsible for RFC 3023
> bis think. I'm copying Chris and Murata-san. To me, having a +xml type
> that's sometimes not XML seems bogus, but let's see what others say.

Getting more eyes on this wouldn't hurt.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Monday, 8 November 2010 19:05:22 UTC