- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:07:54 -0400
- To: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Monday 2010-03-22 13:58 -0400, Dan Connolly wrote: > Leaders in the community seem to be taking another look at CSS > vendor prefixes. > > http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2010/03/css_vendor_pref.html > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Mar/0026.html > (I bookmarked that one under http://delicious.com/connolly/web+architecture; > meant to send it here by didn't manage until now. I haven't fully thought > it thru yet, but now seems as good a time as any...) > > This seems relevant to ISSUE-41 > LanguageVersioning-41 I think the underlying issue here is less a problem with the mechanism than a problem that the working group has not been aggressive enough in advancing properties to Candidate Recommendation (or to some other status where we've agreed implementations can implement properties without prefixes). In many cases, I think this is related to different properties within the same draft having different stability levels. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2010 13:08:23 UTC