Re: Notes on the draft polyglot document Polyglot document

Le 10-juin-10 à 08:57, Daniel Glazman a écrit :
>> Personally I don't see what's wrong with the term 'Polyglot', but
> Because my first reaction - with my light linguistics background -
> when I saw the title was "oh a spec for multilingual documents" ?

That was my exact reaction (and a field I wish to travel to often).

> "Metalanguage-independent (X)HTML5 Documents" is what's really
> meant here, IMHO.

inter-compatible HTML

or so. Sounds to be the best suggestion I heard.


Received on Thursday, 10 June 2010 07:31:51 UTC