RE: ACTION-412: Dan Connolly to followup on metadatainURIs and CSRF

I suggest a follow-up is to bring these issues to HTTP Application Security
BOF in IETF.... (HASMAT).

Larry
--
http://larry.masinter.net


-----Original Message-----
From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Noah Mendelsohn
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 8:28 AM
To: Dan Connolly
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Subject: ACTION-412: Dan Connolly to followup on metadatainURIs and CSRF

Dan,

You've had ACTION-412, which is to follow up on some discussion we had 
about metadata in URIs, CSRF, Webkeys, etc.  Here at the F2F, we're 
inclined to close it, with the understanding that these concerns will 
likely come up again as we pursue security.

Any reason we shouldn't close 412?

Thank you.

Noah