- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:37:00 -0600
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 21:42 -0500, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > Dan Connolly writes: > > > It has the continuation of our Authoritative Metadata > > and Self-Describing Web discussion as item 12, which > > puts it at risk of getting no airtime at all. [...] I suggest moving it > to the > > first technical item in the agenda, or at least before > > Web Site, "Speaks for", and policy mechanisms for Web APIs. > > I've moved it up some, per your request. Thanks. > [...] Anyway, it's a balancing act, and I'm not comfortable committing > to weekly discussion of all of these things until they're closed. My request is only about this case in particular. I agree it's a balancing act, in the general case. > Also, > I sometimes just use my judgement to give things a little space, for email > and reflection. > > > While we're taking up generic resources (issue-53) > > let's look at/update all the relevant actions, i.e. > > action-232 as well as action-231. > > I think action-232 is not due until the day of the telcon, and I saw no > progress on it. So, that's why I haven't scheduled it. Is there some > specific progress that you think merits discussion now? Maybe not, but I think 232 was waiting on 231. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 28 January 2010 03:37:02 UTC