- From: John Kemp <john@jkemp.net>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:15:42 -0500
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Jan 6, 2010, at 4:52 PM, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: [...] > Furthermore, the draft text really doesn't explain how allowance for > sniffing would change the rest of the SDW story. And that was deliberate. I am not "allowing sniffing" so much as saying, "if you are going to sniff then do it this way". I didn't intend to change the meaning of the SDW story at all, or its relationship to the use of authoritative metadata. > After all, we give > examples in which providers of data are held legally accountable for > having published certain content, precisely because the chain of normative > specifications makes clear their correct interpretation. In a world where > people start to "sniff", am I accountable for the (mis) interpretation of > something served as text/plain that just happens to resemble some other > media type? The whole point of SDW is to tell stories like that. > > So, I agree with Larry that we should steer clear of elevating sniffing to > being even a good practice at the architecture level (it's not a > "principle" in the sense of AWWW principles in any case); even if we do > want to acknowledge that widespread use of sniffing in practice in a > revised SDW, I think it behooves us to carefully explain how the core > stories about accountability and lack of ambiguity are affected. I agree that it would be good to explain the ambiguity introduced by sniffing. > I think > we have two choices: 1) leave SDW alone -- it tells a quite coherent > story at the architecture level, and we can view instances of sniffing as > deviations from the architecture > or 2) do a very careful job of explaining > just what does and doesn't change in the SDW story given that sniffing > happens. I have roughly attempted your choice 1) with the understanding that this was the will of the group. As you note though, we could do a much more careful job of explaining what changes given that sniffing happens. Regards, - johnk > > Noah > > -------------------------------------- > Noah Mendelsohn > IBM Corporation > One Rogers Street > Cambridge, MA 02142 > 1-617-693-4036 > -------------------------------------- > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 7 January 2010 15:16:19 UTC