- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:14:14 +0100
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ian Hickson writes: > To help evaluate the above suggestion, could I ask for a brief summary of > the problems that the above changes are intended to address? Section 12.1 is in effect a media type registration, and as such should follow the guidelines for such from the IETF. In particular, it is an update of an existing registration, and the IETF has guidelines for that case as well. The proposed changes are directed at bringing the section in to line with those guidelines. In particular, the IETF guidelines are intended to guarantee the status of legacy documents doesn't change _with respect to the media type_. That is, it is perfectly OK for a new version of a language specification to change what is and is not allowed -- HTML 4 did this, and so does HTML5, and that's just fine. What is _not_ OK is for a media type registration to as it were blacklist the _serving_ of legacy content as the same media type it has been served with in the past. Against that background, the proposed changes basically try to make the section more like an update to its predecessor, RFC 2854, by 1) Incorporating an updated version of the RFC's historical recapitulation; 2) Making clear that continuing to serve documents as text/html is OK even if the documents concerned are not conformant to this specification, but that they will be interpreted according to this specification. Hope this helps, ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLzYyGkjnJixAXWBoRAh0LAJ0Z3PK0gzPAaU1FHAZCJkeQkcQDGACeKqMo nFn2u8w34ev2mrx8rV0Ot2c= =PgW0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 20 April 2010 11:14:54 UTC