Re: f2f Agenda Planning -- Issue 62

Thank you Ashok, this looks like a very good start.  It would be very 
helpful to me if in the next week or two you would, working with Dan while 
I am gone, try to evolve this closer to the form of a F2F agenda item. 
Substantively, I think that means relating this to existing open actions, 
and if appropriate opening new ones.  Also, it would be very helpful if 
you could give links to current versions of references, and suggest to 
other TAG members which should be required reading in advance of our 
discussion, and which are provided just for reference.

Right now, I'm assuming your work on this and Larry's look at issue 63 
will be more or less orthogonal, but please do keep an eye out for any 
areas that might require coordination.  Thank you.

Noah

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------








ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org
11/13/2009 08:43 AM
Please respond to ashok.malhotra
 
        To:     "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
        cc:     (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
        Subject:        f2f Agenda Planning -- Issue 62


Issue 62 is about Uniform Access to Metadata. 
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/62
My take on the landscape is that we now have several mechanisms for 
access to Metadata
(Link Header, Link, Site-Meta, RDFa) which we are reasonably satisfied 
with and what we need is
a document that ties them all together and explains what should be used 
in what situations with examples, etc.

Jonathan had taken an action to start work on such a document.  See 
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/282
If we could have a draft to discuss at the f2f, that would be wonderful.

As I told some of you, I ran into Mark Nottingham at the TPAC and we 
talked about a document
to tie the threads of Metadata access together.  Mark said he was 
interested in writing such a document but
was constrained by time availability etc.  I have not followed up with 
Mark because, I think, the TAG should
first decide what we want to do in the area.
-- 
All the best, Ashok

Received on Friday, 13 November 2009 14:33:27 UTC