W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Five mechanical approaches to make an XSD profile without getting bogged by individual issues

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:30:26 +0100
To: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bab4wytul.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>
Hash: SHA1

Rick Jelliffe writes:

> Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>> It lead to the creation of the XML Schema Patterns for Databinding
>> Working Group [1].
>> That group published a number of drafts of specifications called _Basic
>> XML Schema Patterns for Databinding Version 1.0_ [2] and _Advanced XML
>> Schema Patterns for Databinding_ 1.0 [3], and then ran out of
>> committed person-power and closed.
> Actually, they are now out as Group Notes.
> http://www.w3.org/TR/#Notes
> Do you see that this looks like making it someone else's problem, then
> ignoring the result?
> I may have missed it, but in what way did the XSD WG use these notes
> or drafts? Surely since it came out of an XSD WG workshop, I would
> imagine that the XSD WG would have considered themselves the primary
> users of such an effort, and they would have tried to fold the
> emerging results of the draft into XSD 1.1 at every opportunity.

I didn't see it that way, no.  I see it as an appropriate response to
a community request for profiles of XSD suitable for data binding use,
for people who wanted to use XSD for data binding.  From the Abstract [1]:

  This specification provides a set of basic [XML Schema 1.0] patterns
  known to be interoperable between state of the art databinding

I don't see how that can or should have been input into XSD 1.1.


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-xmlschema-patterns-20090505/
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
                         Half-time member of W3C Team
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

Received on Friday, 29 May 2009 12:31:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:29 UTC