W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Five mechanical approaches to make an XSD profile without getting bogged by individual issues

From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 20:42:27 +1000
Message-ID: <4A1FBC13.4000500@allette.com.au>
To: www-tag@w3.org
Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> It lead to the creation of the XML Schema Patterns for Databinding
> Working Group [1].
> That group published a number of drafts of specifications called _Basic
> XML Schema Patterns for Databinding Version 1.0_ [2] and _Advanced XML
> Schema Patterns for Databinding_ 1.0 [3], and then ran out of
> committed person-power and closed.
Actually, they are now out as Group Notes.

Do you see that this looks like making it someone else's problem, then 
ignoring the result?

I may have missed it, but in what way did the XSD WG use these notes or 
drafts? Surely since it came out of an XSD WG workshop, I would imagine 
that the XSD WG would have considered themselves the primary users of 
such an effort, and they would have tried to fold the emerging results 
of the draft into XSD 1.1 at every opportunity.
Rick Jelliffe
Received on Friday, 29 May 2009 10:43:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:29 UTC