- From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:57:35 -0700
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- CC: www-tag@w3.org, Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
Personally, I think we should just let this go. The TAG has bigger fish to fry. If we do want to ask for something, we should ask WS-RA to define what happens if you send an http GET to the URI in an EPR. The answer should not be a 404 or a SOAP message. All the best, Ashok noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > I chatted with Bob a bit at the AC meeting this week. We all know that > there have been some reservations on the part of individual TAG members > about about aspects of either WS-RA itself, or the ways in which WS-RA > uses technologies like WS-Addressing. In particular, I've heard concerns > expressed about the extent to which WS-RA re-implements HTTP at a > different level and the stack, and also the possibility that WS-RA might > encourage the use of WSA reference parameters for identification. If the > TAG does intend to raise such concerns against WS-RA formally, Bob > requests that we do so earlier rather than later. > > So, I would appreciate it if other TAG members would let me know whether > they wish to schedule discussion of such concerns. I will collect > responses and, based on them, decide about discussion scheduling. If I > get no such responses, I will (after doublechecking with the TAG) confirm > to Bob that we do not currently expect to raise such issues against WS-RA. > Thank you. > > Noah > > -------------------------------------- > Noah Mendelsohn > IBM Corporation > One Rogers Street > Cambridge, MA 02142 > 1-617-693-4036 > -------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> > Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org > 03/23/2009 04:27 PM > > To: www-tag@w3.org > cc: public-ws-resource-access-comments@w3.org, (bcc: Noah > Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM) > Subject: WS-Resource-Access FPWG > > > Dear TAG > The WS-Resource-Access working group, on 2009-03-17 published the FPWD > of five specifications and has begun public review: > WS-Transfer[1] > WS-Resource-Transfer[2] > WS-Eventing[3] > WS-Enumeration[4] > WS-Metadata-Exchange[5] > > Emails to all known groups in several organizations that may have an > interest in these specifications will be sent in the near future. > > Prior to the start of the WS-Resource-Access working group, a TAG > resolution[6] was published expressing concerns about several details > of some of these specifications, especially WS-Transfer. Since the > WG is now under way, and on a tight nominal schedule, it would benefit > all involved if issues that might arise from your review were to be > created earlier rather than later. It is my hope that all issues that > might be raised against fundamental aspects of any of these > specifications be created before Last Call if at all possible. > To that end, would the TAG please respond with specific issues of > concern that in the opinion of the TAG need to be resolved in these > specifications at its earliest convenience. > In any case, a response with issues, or a statement of no-issues would > be appreciated. > > thanks > Bob Freund > Chair, WS-Resource-Access Working Group > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ws-transfer-20090317/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ws-resource-transfer-20090317/ > [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ws-eventing-20090317/ > [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ws-enumeration-20090317/ > [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ws-metadata-exchange-20090317/ > [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Nov/0008.html > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2009 23:59:57 UTC