- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:10:17 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
The agenda for tomorrow's TAG teleconference is available at [1,2], and is
included in text form below. I apologize for it coming later than usual,
but I was at the AC meeting earlier this week. One additional note: we
had agreed at the end of our last call to defer discussion of metadata
until Larry Masinter is available. Since he has sent regrets for
tomorrow, I have not included metadata in this agenda. I will schedule it
the next time that Larry and others with an interest in this issue are
available.
Noah
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/03/26-agenda
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/tag-weekly
--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------
[1]W3C | [2]TAG | Previous: (Telcon) Prev: [3]12th March Next: 19
March 2009
[1] http://www.w3.org/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/
[3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/03/12-agenda
Agenda of 26 March 2009 TAG teleconference
Nearby: [4]Teleconference details - [5]issues list and [6]Issue
Tracker ([7]handling new issues) - [8]www-tag archive - [9]tag
archive
1. Convene
+ Chair: Noah, Scribe: Henry (confirmed)
+ Roll call -- Regrets: Larry
+ Note future regrets: Larry (26 March)
+ Agenda Review - [10]this agenda
+ Next Telcon: Propose 2 April 2009; Chair: Noah; Scribe:
Larry
+ Future scribes: Larry > Jonathan > Dan > Ashok
2. Approval of Minutes from previous telcon
+ [11]12th March 2009
3. Administrative items (Brief)
+ We are still awaiting draft minutes for 4 March 2009 (Wed.
F2F session)
+ [12]WBS Survey on proposed 2-6 November 2009 W3C Technical
Plenary (TPAC) (W3C member only) to be held in Santa Clara,
CA.
o Recent tradition is that those TAG members who are at
TPAC anyway meet for a half day Monday, and a half day
Friday, and we also attempt to make ourselves
available to other working groups on a best effort
basis during the week. Typically we do not have a
quorum and thus don't make binding decisions. Do we
want to continue the tradition at the November 2009
TPAC? Would anyone prefer attempting a more formal TAG
meeting at TPAC?
o Note that the W3C team is still deciding whether to
hold the TPAC as proposed, or perhaps at some other
place and time, or perhaps not at all.
o Survey response is due from the chair by 2 April 2009.
We should indicate whether we expect to attend, likely
number of attendees, etc.
+ Reminder that chair has sent a [13]summary of materials
relating to TAG priorities and a [14]request that the next
round of discussions of goals and priorities be done using
email, starting now.
4. HTML
+ Background:
o [15]Proposals from W3C team (W3C member-only — see
subsection labeled 'Relation of HTML to XHTML2 and
XForms')
o [16]Request from Larry and [17]request from T.V.
Raman(member-only) that we schedule this discussion
soon.
o [18]Detailed discussion of this topic on the previous
TAG teleconference.
o New: Discussion of HTML at just completed W3C Advisory
Committee meeting.
o New: Dan Connolly and Michael Sperberg-McQueen draft
[19]Web addresses in HTML 5, which is factored from
the HTML t draft. (see [20]email from Dan announcing
the draft). This seems also to relate to
[21]ACTION-188 on Dan Connolly: Investigate the
URL/IRI/Larry Masinter possible resolution of the
URL/HTML5 issue. - due 2009-03-17 - open.
+ Goals:
o There were some very interesting discussions of HTML
and XHTML at the just completed W3C Advisory Committee
Meeting. Those who were there will briefly review
those discussions, for the benefit of TAG members who
were not present.
o Decide whether to close [22]ACTION-188.
5. webApplicationState-60 ([23]ISSUE-60): Web Application State
Management
+ Background:
o Draft TAG findining [24]State in Web application
design (Version: 19 April 2006)
o [25]Request from T.V. Raman that we publish this as a
W3C Working Draft.
o The following actions are open or pending review for
ISSUE-60:
# [26]ACTION-193 on Dan Connolly to Try to draft a
blog posting adapted from
[27]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/hash-in-url,
with help from TVR - due 2009-02-25, pending
review
# [28]ACTION-234 on John Kemp to Review the current
draft of Usage Patterns For Client-Side URL
parameters for possible publication - due
2009-03-11, pending review
# [29]ACTION-247 on to Noah to schedule followup on
Raman proposal: publish issue 60 draft - due
2009-03-24, pending review
# [30]ACTION-235 on Ashok Malhotra to Review the
current draft of Usage Patterns For Client-Side
URL parameters for possible publication - due
2009-03-11, open
+ Goals:
o Decide whether to publish a W3C working draft.
o Review status of actions.
o Consider whether there is other work to be scheduled
now, or whether we should await reaction to the WD.
6. CURIEs in RDFa, @rel, and the HTML profile attribute
+ Background:
o The TAG been [31]asked to help resolve concerns with
the use of CURIEs in RDFa and with the HTML profile
attribute.
o See also athe very long email thread that began with
an [32]email message from Mark Nottingham to www-tag
titled "Using XMLNS in link/@rel", which in turn led
to a message to the public-html list from Julian
Reschke titled [33]@rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to
ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel.
The long thread starts with that; early messages in
the thread were not cross-posted to www-tag, but later
ones were (starting with [34]this one).
+ Goals:
o Review www-tag discussion of this issue
o Decide what steps, if any, the TAG wants to take to
help the community resolve these concerns.
7. contentTypeOverride-24 ([35]ISSUE-24):
+ Background:
o Dan Connolly [36]suggests that we discuss the draft
[37]Content-Type Processing Model, by Ian Hickson and
Adam Barth; the draft proposes interoperable rules for
Content-type "sniffing" in browsers. Note that the
draft acknowledges at one point that it is in "...
willful violation of the HTTP specification.
[38]RFC2616]".
+ Goals:
o Decide whether TAG wants to respond to the
Content-Type Processing Model draft.
8. XMLVersioning-41 ([39]ISSUE-41).
+ Background:
o The TAG had earlier decided not to actively pursue
development of the finding on versioning.
o HTML working group action 108 [40]requests that the
TAG consider HTML when working on versioning
o See thread starting with [41]John Kemp email on
updating AWWW good practice note on versioning
o At 23 March 2009 AC meeting there was at least an
informal sense that the AC wanted the TAG to help with
the extensibility issue, primarily in the context of
HTML. Tim took an action (from the AC, not the TAG) to
see that the TAG takes a look at this.
o The following actions are open under ISSUE-41, but the
chair proposes not to discuss them in detail on this
call:
# [42]ACTION-183 (David Orchard) Incorporate
formalism into versioning compatibility
strategies. Due 3 March 2009.
# [43]ACTION-229 (Noah Mendelsohn) Noah to respond
to John Kemp proposal of Feb 17 on versioning.
Due 13 March 2009.
+ Goals:
o Decide whether, given the background referenced above,
we want to again work actively on versioning, and if
so, with what specific goals.
9. Pending Review Items:
+ [44]Pending review actions in [45]Tracker
10. Overdue Action Items:
+ [46]Overdue actions in [47]Tracker
11. Any other business
_________________________________________________________
[4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#telcon
[5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues
[6] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Jul/0054.
[8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/
[10] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/03/26-agenda
[11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/03/12-minutes
[12] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34786/TPAC2009/
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Mar/0138.html
[14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/03/26-agenda.html
[15] http://www.w3.org/2009/02/status.html#hot
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2009Mar/0051.html
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2009Mar/0056.html
[18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/03/12-minutes#item02
[19]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Mar/att-0444/draft.html
[20]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Mar/0444.html
[21] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/188
[22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/188
[23] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/60
[24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/state-20060419
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2009Mar/0023.html
[26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/193
[27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/hash-in-url
[28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/234
[29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/247
[30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/235
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Feb/0295.html
[32] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Feb/0270.html
[33]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Feb/0753.html
[34] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Feb/0279.html
[35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/24
[36] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/03/26-agenda.html
[37] http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-abarth-mime-sniff/
[38] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt
[39] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/41
[40] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/108
[41] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Feb/0147.html
[42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/183
[43] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/229
[44] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview
[45] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/
[46] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue
[47] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/
Noah Mendelsohn for TAG
$Revision: 1.6 $ of $Date: 2009/03/25 16:05:12 $
[48]Valid XHTML 1.1
[48] http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2009 16:14:02 UTC