- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 14:57:35 -0400
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Yes. As I remember this was supposed to be input for the priorities discussion, and it didn't serve that purpose. My main objective now is to get a transition from 'pending review' to 'closed' for my action. It needs to be reviewed for that to happen. If one or two people review it before Thursday, then maybe we can discuss what the TAG might want to do in the metadata area, if anything. Otherwise, the objective for Thursday should be to assign one or two volunteers to review it. Jonathan On Mar 9, 2009, at 11:58 AM, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > My apologies for not getting to this at the F2F. Would you like a > slot on > the Thursday telcon agenda to discuss this? Thanks. > > Noah > > -------------------------------------- > Noah Mendelsohn > IBM Corporation > One Rogers Street > Cambridge, MA 02142 > 1-617-693-4036 > -------------------------------------- > > Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org> > Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org > 02/24/2009 11:23 AM > > To: "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org> > cc: (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM) > Subject: Metadata survey > > Pursuant to ACTION-227, and I hope in time for review prior to the > F2F, I put together the following: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/02/metadata-survey.html > > Due to the short notice this is short on analysis and polish, but I > hope it is of some use as we consider future possible work in the area > of metadata. > > Jonathan > > > >
Received on Monday, 9 March 2009 18:58:17 UTC