- From: John Kemp <john.kemp@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:19:37 -0800
- To: ext Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: Rob Sayre <rsayre@mozilla.com>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "public-xhtml2@w3.org" <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
ext Sam Ruby wrote: > +cc: Chris Wilson > > Rob Sayre wrote: >> The biggest problem is that HTML parsers must reparent elements. This >> would make discerning in-scope namespaces difficult. > > This argument doesn't resonate with me. If properly spec'ed [...] and >>> Separately, xmlns forbids elements with undeclared prefixes. Would Exclusive XML C14N help? http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-exc-c14n/ - johnk
Received on Friday, 6 March 2009 06:21:12 UTC