- From: Robin Cover <robin@oasis-open.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:54:05 -0500 (EST)
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- cc: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
> So is a namespace an information resource? I don't know what the TAG members think at this time, but the Finding "Associating Resources with Namespaces" (TAG Finding 25 June 2008) seems to have said "no": "namespaces are not information resources" http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/nsDocuments/#div.relation - Robin Robin Cover OASIS, Director of Information Services Editor, Cover Pages and XML Daily Newslink Email: robin@oasis-open.org Staff bio: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/staff.php#cover Cover Pages: http://xml.coverpages.org/ Newsletter: http://xml.coverpages.org/newsletterArchive.html Tel: +1 972-296-1783 On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Jonathan Rees wrote: >> ... >> 1. Anyone doing HTTP GETs is going to have to deal with 2xx for things >> that are not NDOOSes, since this happens in so many cases, e.g. XML >> namespaces. To attempt to put this kind of semantics into 2xx is a >> lost cause. >> ... > > Speaking of which, a GET on http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml redirects (301) to > http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/, which returns application/xhtml+xml with a > status 200. > > So is a namespace an information resource? If yes, why can't a relation be an > information resource as well? > > BR, Julian > >
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2009 19:54:50 UTC