- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:00:17 +0100
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Jonathan Rees wrote: > ... > 1. Anyone doing HTTP GETs is going to have to deal with 2xx for things > that are not NDOOSes, since this happens in so many cases, e.g. XML > namespaces. To attempt to put this kind of semantics into 2xx is a > lost cause. > ... Speaking of which, a GET on http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml redirects (301) to http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/, which returns application/xhtml+xml with a status 200. So is a namespace an information resource? If yes, why can't a relation be an information resource as well? BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2009 19:01:15 UTC