- From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:53:02 -0700
- To: David Orchard <orchard@pacificspirit.com>
- CC: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, www-tag@w3.org
Right! I was not talking about browser policy. I was talking about data access policies in the Web. See Tim's article: http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000189,39626896,00.htm All the best, Ashok David Orchard wrote: > I don't understand what you mean that the thinking seems to be moving > away from policy enforcement. Seems to me that browsers are doing > more policy enforcement with the addition of the W3C cross origin > resource sharing. http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-cors-20090317/ > > That is indeed in the browser, but it is about security of web resources. > > Cheers, > Dave > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:23 PM, ashok malhotra > <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote: > >> See, also, Tim on security on the Semantic Web >> http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000189,39626896,00.htm >> >> The article you pointed to, Noah, was about security on the browser while >> this is >> about security on the Web and we may do well by distinguishing them because >> the issues are >> different. >> >> On the Web, the thinking seems to be moving away from policy enforcement, >> which has proved to be challenging, to access transparency or policy >> accountability. >> >> All the best, Ashok >> >> >> noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: >> >>> FYI: ACMQueue has an article [1] on Web security, which is one of the >>> areas the TAG has considered [2] diving into more deeply. The article is at >>> a survey level, but may be of interest anyway. >>> >>> Noah >>> >>> [1] http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1516164 >>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/03/priorities_e.jpg >>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/03/05-whiteboard-priorities.txt >>> >>> -------------------------------------- >>> Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation >>> One Rogers Street >>> Cambridge, MA 02142 >>> 1-617-693-4036 >>> -------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2009 23:55:19 UTC