Re: rel=CURIE in RDFa, but rel=URI in Link:

Shane McCarron wrote:
> FWIW I agree with you.  This only came up because the Link: header 
> proposal had some short relationship names in it.  If the Link: header 
> rel values can have short names, then they should map directly to URIs 

They do. See 

> (for sem web purposes). All we were saying is that we have such URIs 
> already at and Link: resolution 
> could use those. It could also use others - I don't mind.

I think the other point Roy was making that link relations are URIs, not 
IRIs, so new specs that allow non-ASCII characters in link relations 
should deal with the information the loss when transferred as URI.

BR, Julian

Received on Sunday, 28 September 2008 07:42:36 UTC