- From: Drummond Reed <drummond.reed@cordance.net>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:41:49 -0700
- To: "'David Orchard'" <orchard@pacificspirit.com>, "'Peter Davis'" <peter.davis@neustar.biz>, <jbradley@mac.com>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <9E7AB763813E4DA4A846FDEC3F0C8733@ELROND>
David, Thanks for the feedback. The dialog with the TAG and others on this list helped germinate it and the reception has been positive in a number of forums. +1 on kudos to John Bradley for all he's done to help spearhead this. Best, =Drummond _____ From: dorchard100@gmail.com [mailto:dorchard100@gmail.com] On Behalf Of David Orchard Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 2:44 PM To: Drummond Reed; Peter Davis; jbradley@mac.com Cc: www-tag@w3.org Subject: Re: [XRI] XRI-as-Relative-URI proposal My review of the new XRI proposal is at http://www.pacificspirit.com/blog/2008/10/28/xri_as_relative_uri_much_better My one sentence summary is: Good job and thanks for working so hard and diligently on this. Cheers, Dave On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Drummond Reed <drummond.reed@cordance.net> wrote: First, the XRI TC would like to thank the TAG and other members of this list for the extensive feedback they have provided on XRI 2.0 since early July. Proof that it has been productive has been the emergence of a new proposal for how XRIs can better fit with AWWW architecture. This proposal has received extensive discussion within the XRI TC and on the XRI TC mailing list over the last month, and has had an initial preview with the TAG. They found the proposal encouraging and suggested public discussion on this list as a next step. The proposal is written up on an XRI TC wiki page at: http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xri/XriAsRelativeUri I won't even attempt a one-sentence summary here as it would only duplicate the summary there, and the page already serves as a mini-FAQ for most of the questions it has generated. To those who have contributed to the XRI discussions here, and to anyone else interested in the topic of abstract identifiers (in AWWW lingo, identifiers of non-information resources that do not have direct representations, only descriptions), we are very interested in your feedback about this proposal. I'm sure other XRI TC members will chime in with their perspectives and questions too (you'd need a team of a thousand wild horses to stop them ;-) Thanks in advance, =Drummond
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2008 02:42:42 UTC