Re: [XRI] XRI-as-Relative-URI proposal

My review of the new XRI proposal is at
http://www.pacificspirit.com/blog/2008/10/28/xri_as_relative_uri_much_better

My one sentence summary is: Good job and thanks for working so hard and
diligently on this.

Cheers,
Dave

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Drummond Reed
<drummond.reed@cordance.net>wrote:

>
> First, the XRI TC would like to thank the TAG and other members of this
> list
> for the extensive feedback they have provided on XRI 2.0 since early July.
> Proof that it has been productive has been the emergence of a new proposal
> for how XRIs can better fit with AWWW architecture. This proposal has
> received extensive discussion within the XRI TC and on the XRI TC mailing
> list over the last month, and has had an initial preview with the TAG. They
> found the proposal encouraging and suggested public discussion on this list
> as a next step.
>
> The proposal is written up on an XRI TC wiki page at:
>
>        http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xri/XriAsRelativeUri
>
> I won't even attempt a one-sentence summary here as it would only duplicate
> the summary there, and the page already serves as a mini-FAQ for most of
> the
> questions it has generated.
>
> To those who have contributed to the XRI discussions here, and to anyone
> else interested in the topic of abstract identifiers (in AWWW lingo,
> identifiers of non-information resources that do not have direct
> representations, only descriptions), we are very interested in your
> feedback
> about this proposal.
>
> I'm sure other XRI TC members will chime in with their perspectives and
> questions too (you'd need a team of a thousand wild horses to stop them ;-)
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> =Drummond
>
>
>
>