- From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <rden@loc.gov>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:33:03 -0400
- To: "John Kemp" <john.kemp@nokia.com>, "ext David Orchard" <orchard@pacificspirit.com>
- Cc: <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "Jonathan Rees" <jar@creativecommons.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>
From: "John Kemp" <john.kemp@nokia.com> > What are these legitimate reasons? Or perhaps put another way, what do > we consider a "password" to be, if not a *secret* best shared only > between exactly two parties and used to authenticate one party to the > other? Well none of the definitions of password that I come across mentions "exactly two parties". Which just goes to show that "Password" means different things to different people. I think that's the primary cause of this debate. I recommend including a definition, right up front in the finding: "For purposes of this finding a password is defined as ....." .... and craft a definition that fits the finding. --Ray
Received on Friday, 10 October 2008 17:34:01 UTC