- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 19:04:57 +1000
- To: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>, W3C TAG <www-tag@w3.org>
- Cc: HTTP Group Working <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Interesting. It would be useful to educate users as to why using URI schemes like this isn't a good idea, and illustrate the alternatives (namely, media types). I.e., If only we had some sort of technical architecture... board or panel (or even group!) to help document these things for the Web... Seriously, though. Looking through the TAGs findings, I think most of the relevant documents are too dense to be useful to developers like this. How about a "So You Want to Create a URI Scheme" guide, with practical advice about when it's a good idea and when it's not, examples, trade- offs, caveats, and details of what this means in *existing* code? Cheers, On 02/10/2008, at 6:02 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > > Gentlemen, > > load your guns. application uri schemes and posts on GET on the > iPhone: > > http://furbo.org/2008/10/01/redacted/ > > //Stefan > > -- > <green/>bytes GmbH, Hafenweg 16, D-48155 Münster, Germany > Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782 > > > > > -- Mark Nottingham mnot@yahoo-inc.com
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2008 09:07:48 UTC