Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08

Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
> I think Noah's referring to this:

Ah, thank you.  I'm happy to see where this goes (though at a brief 
glance the things it's defining as HTML don't cover all the things that 
HTML4 considers HTML).  I do worry about divergence between this and the 
parsing specification, though.


Received on Monday, 17 November 2008 15:18:52 UTC