RE: Re: TAG recommends against XRI

Hello Ann,

Yes... I think that is correct. Nothing further of substance.

Best regards

Stuart
--
Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Bassetti, Ann
> Sent: 21 May 2008 20:39
> To: 'www-tag@w3.org'
> Cc: 'Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress'
> Subject: Re: TAG recommends against XRI
>
>
>
> Thanks for that reference, Dan. I do not see further mail in
> this thread, so I presume there was not further discussion
> between TAG and XRI TC after Gabe Wachob responded to TAG?
>
>   -- Ann
>
> Ann Bassetti
> Web Integration Manager
> Boeing Information Technology
> Computing and Network Operations
> telephone (desk):  +1.425.865.6603
> mobile:  +1.206.218.8039
> email:  ann.bassetti@boeing.com
>
>
>
>
> From: Dan Connolly
> <connolly@w3.org<mailto:connolly@w3.org?Subject=Re%3A%20TAG%20
> recommends%20against%20XRI&In-Reply-To=%253C48343145.7050205%4
> 0w3.org%253E&References=%253C48343145.7050205%40w3.org%253E>>
> Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 15:27:17 +0100
> Message-ID: <48343145.7050205@w3.org>
> To: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress"
> <rden@loc.gov<mailto:rden@loc.gov?Subject=Re%3A%20TAG%20recomm
> ends%20against%20XRI&In-Reply-To=%253C48343145.7050205%40w3.or
> g%253E&References=%253C48343145.7050205%40w3.org%253E>>
> Cc:
> www-tag@w3.org<mailto:www-tag@w3.org?Subject=Re%3A%20TAG%20rec
> ommends%20against%20XRI&In-Reply-To=%253C48343145.7050205%40w3
> .org%253E&References=%253C48343145.7050205%40w3.org%253E>
>
>
> Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:
> > Was there a response from OASIS to the questions asked by Noah in:
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Feb/0009.html ?
>
> I think this is the relevant reply:
>
> XRI TC response to W3C TAG Comments on XRI Resolution 2.0
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Feb/0104.html
>
>
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 22 May 2008 13:29:03 UTC