- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 11:34:27 +0900
- To: Henry Thompson <ht@w3.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag WG <www-tag@w3.org>
Le 9 mai 2008 à 03:39, Norman Walsh a écrit : > See http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/05/08-minutes [snip] > Issue tagSoupIntegration-54 > > <ht> http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/05/syntax_for_aria_costbenefit_an.html > [9] [snip] > DanC: Mike Smith brought this up in the HTML WG IRC channel and > Henry > Sivenen looked at it. We could also do this by email. > > DanC: The implementors have responded somewhat predictably to the > suggestions made by Mike Smith. > > ht: Well, at the very least, email has at least a slightly more > citable > record. for information http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20080508#l-114 # # [12:30] <MikeSmith> http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/05/syntax_for_aria_costbenefit_an.html # # [12:30] <MikeSmith> ↑ # # [12:32] <anne> he still seems to miss the point about DOM consistency and all # # [12:32] <anne> and having different syntaxes for text/html and application/xml # # [12:33] <anne> whatever way you put it, foo:disabled in text/html is entirely different from the same in XML # # [12:46] <hsivonen> MikeSmith: note #0 s very telling # # [12:46] <hsivonen> is # # [12:47] <hsivonen> I think zcorpan's thes material was fine # # [12:47] <anne> he also forgets to mention that in XML you need some xmlns:* in scope for a colon to work at all... # # [12:48] <anne> and he has this assumption that ARIA is somehow not a special case but one of the millions of vocabularies UAs will be implementing in the next ten years # # [12:51] <hsivonen> Uniform DOM access for colon seems wrong # # [12:51] <Dashiva> hsivonen: He might assume xmlns support in HTML # # [13:08] <MikeSmith> hsivonen: true (about note #0) # # [13:12] <MikeSmith> hsivonen: anyway, would be good if you have time to post some comments there # # [13:13] <MikeSmith> Henry has put a lot of time into this, and part of the point of blogging it was to try to get some wider public comment on it # # [13:13] <MikeSmith> (wider than just the discussion we've had so far on our mailing lists) # # [13:13] <hsivonen> MikeSmith: I'm *really* tired of explaining this again :-( # # [13:14] <MikeSmith> cut and paste ? # # [13:14] <hsivonen> could work # # [13:19] <hsivonen> anne: if you feel more inclined to repaint the bikeshed, please go ahead # # [13:20] * MikeSmith looks around for zcorpan # # [13:23] <hsivonen> looks like the settlers used namespaces, but having namespaces sucks compared to unique city names # # [13:24] <hsivonen> (in reference to the Fire Eagle talk) # # [15:49] * zcorpan just read the logs # # [15:49] <zcorpan> i don't understand his motivation # # [15:51] <zcorpan> i'm not worried about implementations swaying away from the dash at this point, and i think i've spent way too much time on this, so it doesn't seem very compelling for me to write a useful comment on the blog post # # [15:52] <zcorpan> other than pointing to my emails on the list, maybe; if someone cares enough to do so, feel free :) -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Friday, 9 May 2008 02:35:04 UTC