RE: Uniform access to ...

A quick comment on the 8-May-2008 draft of
 http://sw.neurocommons.org/2008/uniform-access.html

I don't think the POWDER use case as written motivates the need for "uniform access to metadata" very well, because the metadata is both generated and consumed by the server, so the server can just coordinate with itself about where to find the metadata.  I think a much more compelling case would be if the *client* (or perhaps a filtering proxy) needed to consume the POWDER metadata.

The GRDDL use case looks good.


David Booth, Ph.D.
HP Software
+1 617 629 8881 office  |  dbooth@hp.com
http://www.hp.com/go/software

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Jonathan Rees
> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 10:23 AM
> To: www-tag@w3.org WG
> Subject: Uniform access to ...
>
>
> I wanted to get a draft of our Link: header report out before today's
> TAG meeting, since we'll be discussing it briefly. I know that given
> the short notice I can't expect TAG members to review this in time
> for the meeting, but if you would take a quick look, I'd
> appreciate it.
>
> http://sw.neurocommons.org/2008/uniform-access.html
>
> It's still quite rough, and like the wiki page and other informal
> documents of this sort it is so far unversioned.
>
> Jonathan
>
> (Tracker, this is ISSUE-57)
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 9 May 2008 01:55:17 UTC