- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:36:55 -0400
- To: wangxiao@musc.edu
- Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Xiaoshu Wang writes: > Wouldn't it be more meaningful and precise to designate a GRDDL > mime-type and bound it transformation sheet to the same URI? Doesn't this make it impossible to have GRDDL for the GRDDL document itself? Granting that this may be a stretch in common usage, I think it's a good test of architectural soundness that these edge cases work out. I think what we're seeing here: mime types are closer to what RDDL calls a "nature" than a "purpose". You're using them for a "purpose", I think. Noah -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 --------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 31 March 2008 21:36:42 UTC