- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:22:29 +1000
- To: "Marcos Caceres" <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>, "Larry Masinter" <LMM@acm.org>, "Jon Ferraiolo" <jferrai@us.ibm.com>, public-appformats@w3.org, public-appformats-request@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote: > On 2008-06-17 16:14:20 +1000, Marcos Caceres wrote: > >> Irrespective of encoding issues, the premise remains that the HTTP >> protocol is not suitable for widgets and hence we need "widgets://" > > You mean that the http URI scheme is not suitable for widgets. Yes. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au http://standardssuck.org
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2008 22:23:10 UTC