W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2008

Re: Question about the On Linking Alternative Representations TAG Finding

From: John Kemp (Nokia-S&S/Williamstown) <john.kemp@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:44:38 -0400
Message-ID: <4891FA06.2090201@nokia.com>
To: "ext Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>
CC: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com>, "seb@serialseb.com" <seb@serialseb.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, "kidehen@openlinksw.com" <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, "tthibodeau@openlinksw.com" <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>

ext Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) wrote:
>> From: Richard Cyganiak [ . . . ] Let's say I have
>> /resource      (generic information resource with HTML and JSON 
>> variants) /resource.html (a HTML specific URI) /resource.json (a
>> JSON specific URI)
>> Now let's say I request /resource.json with an Accept header of 
>> "Accept: text/html". What should happen?
>> One opinion is that the JSON should be served anyway, because the
>> URI identifies a specific variant.
> I think serving the JSON is the best option.  Serving HTML from
> /resource.json would defeat the purpose of having a JSON-specific
> URI.   It is quite likely that the user pasted the JSON URI into a
> browser to test it, and *wants* to see the JSON that is returned.
> Everyone knows how to paste a URI into a browser; few know how to
> configure their browsers to specify their desired MIME types.

One point to note here is that if you *do* return JSON to a browser, and 
you give it the MIME media type 'application/json', that even if the 
user *wants* to see the JSON in her browser, she may be disappointed. 
Last time I looked, I was prompted to download things of that type, 
rather than 'seeing' them in my browser.

Servers might wish to consider that when performing content negotiation 
with a user-agent.


- johnk

> David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office  |
> dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software
> Statements made herein represent the views of the author and do not
> necessarily represent the official views of HP unless explicitly so
> stated.
Received on Thursday, 31 July 2008 17:46:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:23 UTC