W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2008

RE: Should the HTTP protocol become "inapropriate"

From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:04:35 +0000
To: John Bradley <john.bradley@wingaa.com>
CC: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <184112FE564ADF4F8F9C3FA01AE50009FCFC7B119B@G1W0486.americas.hpqcorp.net>

> From: John Bradley [mailto:john.bradley@wingaa.com]
[ . .  . ]
> > >           * use the least specific bits of the domain name
> >
> >     That would also be fine if the owner of that URI space
> >    chooses to establish that convention.
>
> This is convenient in that it allows multiple proxies without
> registration.  The downside is that it confers special
> meaning on a host name and can have an impact on people who
> don't want to participate in the sub-scheme.
>
> Why should someone tell me that xri or xmpp is a reserved
> host name.   I can see this leading to all sorts of great.
>
> It is equivalent to saying that part of the http protocol
> will only apply to hosts named www.

Hold on, it sounds like I misunderstood your short-hand.  When you said one of the options was:

> > >           * use the least specific bits of the domain name

I thought you were talking about using http://hxri.xri.net/ as a URI prefix to indicate that all URIs matching http://hxri.xri.net/* conform to a particular URI convention and should be interpreted as HXRIs.   It would *not* be okay to claim that all URIs matching http://hxri.*.*/* should be interpreted as HXRIs.  The XRI TC does not have the authority to define the special conventions for http://hxri.*.*/*, but the owner of xri.net *does* have the authority to define special conventions for http://hxri.xri.net/* .




David Booth, Ph.D.
HP Software
+1 617 629 8881 office  |  dbooth@hp.com
http://www.hp.com/go/software

Statements made herein represent the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of HP unless explicitly so stated.
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2008 17:06:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:23 UTC