- From: Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) <skw@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:21:39 +0000
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Mark, Thanks for the pointer... doesn't look like it made it into either branch of the registry... (or maybe it was in the Provisonal branch for a while... but it's not listed there now). Any idea's as to it's fate/adoption? Thx, Stuart -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England > -----Original Message----- > From: mark@coactus.com [mailto:mark@coactus.com] On Behalf Of > Mark Baker > Sent: 06 February 2008 13:58 > To: Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) > Cc: www-tag@w3.org; Graham Klyne; Jonathan Borden > Subject: Re: [httpRedirections-57] Resource-Decription > Header: a possible proposal to consider. > > On 2/6/08, Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) <skw@hp.com> wrote: > > The Idea: > > --------- > > <quote> > > I generally agree. "Site" is one type of resource, perhaps > its special > > enough to get its own HTTP header (?) but why not just > (example HTTP > > response headers): > > > > Resource-Type: http://example.org/siteOntology#Site > > Resource-Description: http://example.org/site.rdf > > > > would solve this problem, as well as [httpRange-14] in a > general fashion. > > </quote> > > FWIW, Resource-Type was specified here; > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Mar/att-0054/draft-palmer-resrep-type-00.txt > > Mark. > -- > Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca > Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com >
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2008 14:24:12 UTC