- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:57:52 -0500
- To: "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, "Graham Klyne" <GK@ninebynine.org>, "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>
On 2/6/08, Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) <skw@hp.com> wrote: > The Idea: > --------- > <quote> > I generally agree. "Site" is one type of resource, perhaps its special > enough to get its own HTTP header (?) but why not just (example HTTP > response headers): > > Resource-Type: http://example.org/siteOntology#Site > Resource-Description: http://example.org/site.rdf > > would solve this problem, as well as [httpRange-14] in a general fashion. > </quote> FWIW, Resource-Type was specified here; http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Mar/att-0054/draft-palmer-resrep-type-00.txt Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2008 13:58:03 UTC