- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:12:37 +0100
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Julian Reschke wrote: >> Does the spec specify how to parse or serialize a future element called >> "foobar"? > > Yes. OK, where, specifically, is the serialization defined? > (The parsing algorithm might change in a future version, of course; that's > the problem with a having a syntax that isn't self-descriptive, like XML, > or forwards-compatible, like CSS. There's not much we can do about that.) If the parsing section changes, will it affect serialization? Meaning, will it break existing producers? >>>> That's a very verbose way to state "must ignore unknown values". >>> It's a precise way of saying it, that leaves nothing ambiguous. That's >>> the whole point. >> I think the same precision can be reached with less verbosity. > > Oh, well, I'm sure it can be said more tersely, sure. (Just out of > interest, how would you phrase it?) I'd try to reduce repetition. > ... BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 30 December 2008 14:13:18 UTC