- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:28:32 +0200
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- CC: "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, John Bradley <john.bradley@wingaa.com>, www-tag@w3.org
noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > Julian Rescke writes: s/Rescke/Reschke/ >> But <http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names11/> is the namespaces specification >> for XML 1.1, right? <http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names> (from the same >> date) still refers to RFC 3986 (URI). > > Fair enough. I had forgotten that Namespaces 1.0 was republished at the > same time as, rather than superceded by Namespaces 1.1. The question here > seems to be: if one has in hand something like an XRI, must one in > general escape it for use as an XML namespace name? The answer seems to > be: no if the software you use supports Namespaces 1.1, yes if your > software supports only Namespaces 1.0. That right? In theory: yes. In practice, it probably doesn't make a difference (although I'd like that not to be the case :-) BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 14:29:16 UTC