- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:00:07 -0700
- To: "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>, "John Cowan" <cowan@ccil.org>, "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: "Technical Architecture Group WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, "Susie Stephens" <susie.stephens@gmail.com>
We could then have the Uniform Anything Identifier and the Anything Description Framework. Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Pat Hayes > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 1:55 PM > To: John Cowan; Tim Berners-Lee > Cc: Technical Architecture Group WG; Susie Stephens > Subject: Re: Preferable alternative to 'resource' > > > >>Tim Berners-Lee scripsit: > >> > >>> So, Pat, what would be a better word which we should use > instead? > >>> The class of all ____ s? The class of which all classes are > >>> subclasses is the class of ____ s? > >> > >>Subjects, in accordance with the OED's definition 13a: "That which > >>forms, or is chosen as, the matter of thought, consideration, or > >>inquiry; a topic, theme." Using "subject" rather than "object" or > >>"thing" allows us to talk about the imaginary as well as the real. > > > >Yes, that does avoid a potential problem with "thing". And its close > >to, but not identical to, "topic". Just make sure to avoid the > >grammatical implication, is all. > > > > Though, on further reflection, this is going to give rise to > problems as well. The OED sense isn't found, for example, in > Wikipedia (not surprising if it is number 13a, now I think of > it), though the RDF sense is (!); and the grammatical sense > is much more common. > Philosophers will contrast 'subject' with 'object' and > presume we are only talking about agents. Lawyers will > presume we are referring to citizens as opposed to aliens. > Its hard to beat "thing" if we also say that we allow > imaginary and non-existent things. And its harder still to > beat "anything". > > Pat > > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home > 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office > Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax > FL 32502 (850)291 0667 cell > phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes > > >
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2007 21:01:02 UTC