- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:02:13 -0500
- To: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
- Cc: W3C-TAG <www-tag@w3.org>, semantic-web-ig list <semantic-web-ig.list@reuters.com>
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 14:47 +0100, Misha Wolf wrote: > How about 303 redirects? Well, reading the spec, I see "The new URI is not a substitute reference for the originally requested resource." http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3.4 which strongly suggests, to me, that both URIs should be persistent. > And what about content negotiation? What about it? Could you elaborate on the question? What are you trying to do? > The requestor's original > URI could be redirected to different URIs depending on MIME > Type and Language. > > Which of these many URIs would represent the resource for the > SemWeb? "the resource"? which resource? Could you tell me the beginning of this story? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2007 14:02:36 UTC