RE: Review of EXI

The EXI WG did a huge amount of measurement work, referenced in my
original message as
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-exi-measurements-20070725/.
Section 9.1.3 shows the Processing Efficiency Analysis Details
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-exi-measurements-20070725/#Ax-details-pe

Out of curiosity Karl and John, did you not see this section or does the
section not address your needs?  I made an assertion that the document
is too detailed for any but the most diligent reader so you can offer
your own data points on that.

Cheers,
Dave 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karl Dubost [mailto:karl@w3.org] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:24 PM
> To: John Cowan
> Cc: Dan Connolly; David Orchard; W3C-TAG Group WG
> Subject: Re: Review of EXI
> 
> 
> 
> John Cowan (31 oct. 2007 - 05:43) :
> > Dan Connolly scripsit:
> >>> These leads us to wonder whether a combination GZip with improved 
> >>> technologies such as Parsers, JDKs, VMs, or even Stack 
> Integration 
> >>> technology (that is Schema aware and hence covered under Both and
> >>> Schema) would suffice for the community.
> >
> > gzip decoding is expensive in both speed and space, and the 
> speed cost 
> > is raised even higher because decoding and parsing are typically 
> > performed as separate steps.
> 
> That would be cool to have a benchmarks table (tests with 
> different scenarios).
> So we could put it online. That would be a useful reference.
> Someone has the details handy somewhere?
> 
> 
> --
> Karl Dubost - W3C
> http://www.w3.org/QA/
> Be Strict To Be Cool
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:31:17 UTC